UGC Assistant Professor Recruitment Decision Sparks Questions– You know that on July 5, the University Grants Commission published an announcement detailing the minimum requirements for assistant professor posts. Two opposing viewpoints exist on this issue. In the article below, you will find perspectives from current faculty and Ph.D. holders.

Minimum assistant professor recruitment criteria

The University Grants Commission had already determined that a passing score in the National Eligibility Test, the Set or the SLET was a requirement for anyone interested in applying for a position as an associate professor. The decision was not unanimously accepted by all, and everyone had their own opinion.

The Ph.D. students who are already employed by the institution and the faculty members that were also working there expressed their disapproval of this decision. They were concerned that it could lower the quality of assistant professors. The Ph.D. holders also pointed out that they undergo a rigorous learning process lasting four to five year when they enroll in a Ph.D. In addition, candidates receive assistance with the preparation of the Ph.D. they will conduct. Many people, however, believe that candidates with a Ph.D. will be preferred because they are seen as fair and have extensive knowledge and experience.

What do professors have to say?

Former members of the UGC also point out that the decision is confusing for the applicants, rather than clarifying the situation. In the past, a solid academic background was required to be considered as an associate professor. A doctorate was therefore seen as a great advantage.

The conclusion of the article is:

A possible conclusion would be that the majority of candidates were pleased with the results of the election. The professors with doctorates and other academics have divergent views. They believe this could lead to a decrease in the quality of education.